Situation stalled... why cracking your head?

Problem 1:
Nizar had been pronounced as the rightful MB in Perak, so he should be allowed to carry on his duty as a MB.

Zambry obtained an order for stay of execution of KL High Court’s decision, so Nizar can no longer carry on his duty as MB.

KL High Court’s decision remains good and intact, until being overturned by the Court of Appeal. The stay of execution does not in any way overturn the decision. So, Zambry is NOT the legitimate MB.

If Zambry is not the legitimate MB, he cannot enter MB office.

If there is a stay of execution, Nizar cannot enter MB office.

From 2 MBs in Perak, the People of Perak now have NO Menteri Besar.

Situation stalled.

Problem 2:
KL High Court pronounced Nizar as the rightful MB. Only a motion of no-confidence in the Dewan can remove him.

Zambry can only legitimatize himself by moving a motion of no-confidence against Nizar in the Dewan.

If Zambry moves a motion of no-confidence in the Dewan, it means Zambry is recognizing Nizar as the MB.

If Zambry moves a motion of no-confidence in the Dewan, it means Zambry admits he is not the MB.

If Zambry is not the MB, he should not occupy the MB office now.

As such, Zambry cannot move a motion of no-confidence against Nizar.

As such, Nizar cannot be removed.

Situation stalled.

Why cracking your head?
Why cracking your head? Dissolve the Assembly and return the mandate to the People.

In a democracy country, it is the People’s choice, not BN PR or the Court’s choice.